Designer Thinking
The philosophy
Rooted in Dieter Rams' 10 Principles of Good Design. Humanity first. Emotionally driven. Principled to the last detail.
"Good design is as little design as possible."
— Dieter Rams
Every design problem begins with a question, not an answer. Before touching software, before selecting materials, before sketching a single line — the work is understanding what the space or product actually needs to do for the human at its centre.
This is a realistic but open-minded process. Grounded in facts. Open to possibility. The goal is never novelty for its own sake — it's clarity, humanity, and work that feels right and functions honestly.
Design is not decoration. It is the consequence of understanding deeply enough to make decisions with confidence.
Capture the Question
Before research, before precedents, before a single sketch — identify and reframe the core design question. Every project has a thesis. Finding it is the first act of design.
The question is not "design a lobby." It is: how can we make a government building feel like it belongs to its people? That reframe changes everything that follows.
5W1H Research
Six frames, rigorously applied. Who are the users, stakeholders, and community? What is being designed and what must it do? Why does it need to exist? Where will it live — physically, culturally, digitally? When will it be used? How might it be made and experienced?
Each question is answered twice: with a realistic view of what is factually true, and with an open-minded view of what could be if we imagine carefully.
Dieter Rams Lens
Filter every design direction through Rams' 10 Principles. Not all ten apply equally to every project — the discipline is identifying the three to five principles most relevant, and letting them demand specific things of the design.
A civic center must be honest. A shelter must be unobtrusive. An artist studio must be aesthetic. These are not optional — they are the design constraints that replace arbitrary decisions with principled ones.
User Empathy
This is not a demographic exercise. It is an act of imagination and compassion. Who is this person, really — not their role, but their life? What do they feel when they encounter this problem today? What do they need that they may not even be able to articulate?
What would delight them? What would disappoint them? How should they feel before, during, and after moving through this space? The user must become real before any design decision is made.
Precedent Works
Three to five built projects, products, or experiences that speak directly to this design challenge. Not just the famous ones — the goal is to find the less obvious reference that teaches something specific and unexpected.
For every precedent: what quality makes it relevant? What is the specific lesson to carry forward — and what to consciously avoid?
Concept & Brief
Synthesis into a single concept name — one or two evocative words that anchor every subsequent decision. A concept statement. A "How might we…" thesis question. Three project-specific design principles derived from the research, not borrowed from generic theory.
Then: the full design brief. A living document that disciplines the work — research, empathy portrait, precedents, concept, open questions. Not to be filed and forgotten, but to be returned to every time a decision needs anchoring.
Tadao Ando
Langen Foundation + Church of LightConcrete and light as dialogue. Structure as emotional experience. The lesson: restraint amplifies sensation.
Mies van der Rohe
Neue Nationalgalerie + Farnsworth HouseLess is more — but the less must be perfect. Structural clarity as aesthetic. The discipline of the grid as liberation.
Kengo Kuma
WE Hotel Toya + GC Prostho MuseumMaterial warmth alongside hard lines. Nature as collaborator. The lesson: texture communicates what form cannot.
Hiroshi Nakamura
Optical Glass HouseSimple forms deeply connected to the natural world in dense urban environments. Green and hard lines in tension, in harmony.
Newark Civic Center
"How can we blur the line between government and its people while improving the use of the space?"
The thesis question reframed everything. Instead of designing a functional government building, the project became about removing the atmospheric distance between institution and citizen.
A warm exchange between the city and its people. Green walls, open sightlines, warm wood ceilings, and a lobby designed for human encounter — not security queuing.
Hans Zimmer Studio
"What if the space could inspire the artist?"
The brief was about Hans Zimmer's working process — 11am to 4am, seven days a week, focused on small details that change everything. The space needed to hold that intensity.
An inspiring space surrounded by nature and sunlight. Lake Tahoe. Four seasons. Ando-meets-Kuma warmth. A studio that does not compete with the work inside it.
Melting Pot
"How do you bring order to a chaotic layout while still serving a diverse community?"
Angular walls and informal constraints required a disciplining system. Le Corbusier's pilotis became the structural grammar — columns as the foundation for spatial clarity and community logic.
A space like a stew — diverse ingredients coming together to create something remarkable. Modular, colour-coded, structured by grid, alive with community.